Posted by Frankzett on 24 Feb 2016, 09:41
Well these so called "mounted men at arms" - why don't they call it Knights? - are not bad at all. The extremely articulated horses, only two heavily armoured types, are poor for such a set indeed; and they are a little bulky, we have no buckles on the armor, the seams of the armor plates aren't very fine, I think there are some undefined armor parts ...
But after a long time there is something going on with late 15th cent period related figures. They are better than the MiniArt - knights, they are - all six types - in one defined armour style dating in one special epoche, that's really great, so we have no mix of undefined displaced / fantasy armour!!!
So, I am really keen on to know if their measures and proportions fix with my 15th cent. range figures.
Greetings
Frank